Monthly Archives: December 2011

When It Comes to Vaccines, Don’t Sit On The Fence!

December 20, 2011

When It Comes to Vaccines, Don’t Sit On The Fence!

There are now millions of educated and informed groups of people that will stop and nothing to expose the dangers of vaccinations. Their numbers are growing by the day. Then there is the polar opposite side branching from mainstream medical opinions and misinformation that still believe that routine vaccinations benefit populations due to myths such as “herd immunity” and other nonsensical arguments. Finally, there is a very large intermediary group that also number in the millions, who sit on the fence and are indifferent or undecided about where vaccines stand in terms of advancing health. Many of the fence sitters are made up of those who understand that current vaccination practices are unsafe, yet somehow also believe you can make vaccines safer or more effective. This is an extremely dangerous approach to worldwide vaccination programs and as great a threat to the health of future populations as pro-vaccine policy makers.

“The chief, if not the sole, cause of the monstrous increase in cancer has been vaccination”
— Dr. Robert Bell, once Vice President International Society for Cancer Research at the British Cancer Hospital

You’re either for vaccines or against them. There is no middle ground.
If you think there is, you don’t fully understand or appreciate the toxic nature of vaccines. Negotiating poison is illogical and senseless. We don’t approach poison control agencies and ask them to better regulate limits on the safe consumption of poisons. Whether you drink an ounce or a gallon, you’re still ingesting poison.

All vaccines, every last one of them contain toxic substances that are poisonous to the human body. A recent and excellent article on the contaminated nature of vaccines comes from where the author brilliantly exposes facts on this public threat we falsely label as immunization.

All vaccines contain sterility agents, neurotoxins, immunotoxins, and carcinogenic compounds. Some examples include formaldehyde, a carcinogen found in almost every vaccine, neurotoxins such as monosodium glutamate, potassium chloride, thimerosal, sterility agents such as Triton X-100, octoxynol-10, polysorbate 80, and immuntoxins such as neomycin, monobasic potassium phosphate, sodium deoxycholate to name a few of many.

Thinking we can “green” vaccines, as Jim Carrey and Jenny McCarthy have subscribed to is as ridiculous as an approach to green cigarettes. Proposing to make vaccines more safe, affordable, necessary and effective as is the mission statement of Sane Vax Inc, is preposterous and frankly a betrayal of the anti-vaccine advocates they claim to be representing (or should I say misrepresenting).

Vaccines are poison and always will be because they fail to address the most basic principles of human health, namely homeostatic balance in the absence of deficiency and toxicity. Cells lacking what they need or exposing them to something harmful will inevitably malfunction. Unless cells malfunction, there can be no disease. When you continuously expose cells to harmful chemicals, regardless of intentions, there is no question that you will eventually be in a diseased state.

The Myth of Herd Immunity

Vaccine advocates love to resort to their favorite justification, the Holy Grail of the vaccine proponents — herd immunity. This concept is based upon the idea that 95% (and some now say 100%) of the population must be vaccinated to prevent an epidemic. Herd immunity is mostly a myth and applies only to natural immunity — that is, contracting the infection itself.

In the original description of herd immunity, the protection to the population at large occurred only if people contracted the infections naturally. The reason for this is that naturally-acquired immunity lasts for a lifetime. The vaccine proponents quickly latched onto this concept and applied it to vaccine-induced immunity. But, there was one major problem — vaccine-induced immunity lasted for only a relatively short period, from 2 to 10 years at most, and then this applies only to humoral immunity. This is why they began, silently, to suggest boosters for most vaccines, even the common childhood infections such as chickenpox, measles, mumps, and rubella.

Then they discovered an even greater problem, the boosters were lasting for only 2 years or less. This is why we are now seeing mandates that youth entering colleges have multiple vaccines, even those which they insisted gave lifelong immunity, such as the MMR. The same is being suggested for full-grown adults. Ironically, no one in the media or medical field is asking what is going on. They just accept that it must be done.

That vaccine-induced herd immunity is mostly myth can be proven quite simply. This thinking existed for over 70 years. It was not until relatively recently that it was discovered that most of these vaccines lost their effectiveness 2 to 10 years after being given. What this means is that at least half the population, that is the baby boomers, have had no vaccine-induced immunity against any of these diseases for which they had been vaccinated very early in life. In essence, at least 50% or more of the population was unprotected for decades.

If we listen to present-day wisdom, we are all at risk of resurgent massive epidemics should the vaccination rate fall below 95%. Yet, we have all lived for at least 30 to 40 years with 50% or less of the population having vaccine protection. That is, herd immunity has not existed in this country for many decades and no resurgent epidemics have occurred. Vaccine-induced herd immunity is a lie used to frighten doctors, public-health officials, other medical personnel, and the public into accepting vaccinations.

Beware of Disinformation Specialists

Vaccination is not a practice that we can justify, reason with or negotiate with. The polarizing sides of this debate are very similar to what happened with smoking more than 50 years ago. See The Top 5 Similarities and Practices Between Big Tobacco and Big Pharma.

The tobacco industry and their opposition went through similar arguments in the 1950’s when groups began to expose that smoking was harmful, contrary to the advice of the medical profession (See 1949 commercial – Doctors support Camel cigarettes). Many proponents then presented ideas that moderate smoking or changing the composition of cigarettes (which eventually became “light cigarettes”) would somehow be less toxic. These propositions would eventually be squashed by anti-tobacco groups who exposed their tactics as desperate measures in an attempt to sway opinion and maintain their client base.

Similarly, all of these organizations and movements who are attempting to convince the public that vaccines can be safer are also being exposed as front groups and controlled opposition that serve only to confuse, sidetrack and primarily play both sides using fall-back positions as scapegoats.

I would strongly encourage all readers to review Marco Torres’ article Everything Is A Lie: The Deliberate Intent To Deceive People Is At An All Time High, especially midway through the article which outlines “25 Rules of Disinformation” which exposes common tactics used by these groups to avoid rational and complete examination of any chain of evidence. Disinformation specialists are crawling the internet and are very active in comment forums, especially those relating to vaccines. Their tactics will be very detectable to you after reading the 25 Rules. You may even see some of these tactics used in the comments below this article (as I’ve witnessed on many of my other articles). And you’ll see the same commenter over and over again trying to justify their insanity. As has discovered, many of these individuals will actually use multiple accounts to make it look like others are supporting their positions. This is rampant across the internet. It’s quite comical if you review the comments and see them for what they are.

Stand in Your Truth and Research Wisely

It is no coincidence that the more educated you are, the less chance you will vaccinate which contradicts the misconceptions of many health professionals who profess that parents don’t vaccinate because they are under-educated, poor or misinformed. Those who become fully informed of the dangers of vaccines never see them in the same light again, as their motives then become clear.

To this day, I have yet to receive one credible response from anybody on my 9 questions that stump every pro-vaccine advocate and their claims. Why? Because when you stand on the side of truth, you cannot be defeated. Sure, there have been pathetic attempts to address these questions via pseudoscientific studies and biased journals who only serve their masters, but it further supports my argument that vaccine science is junk science. You will never find one vaccine advocate that can provide a study from an independent, non-biased source that supports vaccines. It does not exist.

It is an absolute disgrace that we need to even continue having these discussions. There is plenty of evidence on and hundreds of other very reputable websites which list fact after fact about the dangers of vaccinations. Do yourself a favour and stay away from any mainstream source for vaccine information such as the CDC, WHO, NIH, medical journals or any other biased source of information with a clear agenda and associations with big pharma. If you want information, research thoroughly, and you will find it in all the right places in time. The message will be loud and clear.

I urge fence sitters to realize that you are not only doing a disservice to yourself, but also to every anti-vaccine advocate that is representing the truth about vaccines. The politically correct game you are playing is detrimental to the advancement of human health. Don’t tell the truth sweetly, just tell it like it is. There is no sugar coating one of the biggest public health threats and hoaxes ever perpetrated on human beings.

Don’t get caught up arguing with those that insist on regurgitating facts from sources with an agenda. There is not a person or organization on earth which can ever justify that injecting known neurotoxins, immunotoxins, carcinogens and sterility agents prevents disease or advances health, at least not in this dimension.

Know your truth and stand in your power. The decision makers of the future who will eventually abolish this practice will never have backed down, never have negotiated, and never have been politically correct. Most of all, they will have never sat on the fence!

What we have right now, and what we are working on.

Given that Vladimir and myself have spent a number of years working on a more accurate translation of the Therapeutic Pocket Book, and that we both use it exclusively in our practices… its no surprise that we have spent time making it available in other languages.

We have it in German. Our translation is from the first 1846 edition and has been corrected where required. Its the original chapter layout and wording.

We have it in Spanish. Again the source was from the 1846 German edition.

We have it in English. Directly translated from the 1846 edition and has been corrected where required.

We nearly have it in Hebrew. Still working on it.

Why the Therapeutic pocket book? It is the only guide to Materia Medica that is actually based on Materia Medica. 125 remedies that have been systematically and accurately portrayed to lead to the correct prescription.

Is it easy to use? Yes it is, PROVIDING you understand Hahnemanns directions for case taking and analysis. Once you have a grasp of the fundamentals, the rest is straight forward.



Changes in HomoeopathyInfo is now the official blog for Polony and Weaver OpenRep Synopsis  ( )

Will this change the content? No. P & W will continue to post items of interest to the homoeopathic community, but will also place our own developments in Repertory and Materia Medica on this web presence. It just is easier to do this than run 4 blogs.

What it will do though is focus the attention more on what homoeopathic practice should be, according to the realities of the practice of the therapy, and allow for articles from practitioners around the world to discuss areas of concern. We welcome your submissions. Please send to for consideration.


Water has memory.