A discussion on some modern views of Provings from the OpenRep university.
A discussion on some modern views of Provings from the OpenRep university.
By Dr Guillermo Zamora.
This is a translation from the Spanish. It has not been cleaned up from my poor attempts and google from the Spanish. as I was afraid to lose too much of the meaning.
The full Spanish translation can be found at: https://pandwespanol.wordpress.com/2015/01/10/reaprendiendo-verdadera-homeopatia/
When you start your studies in homeopathy, either as graduate or undergraduate, you have no idea what is homeopathy; and when you have, you think that any school or college that offers courses “Hahnemannian” do so on the basis of its creator, Dr. Hahnemann.
It begins to study and as time passes, who had the desire to have studied something medically worthwhile, we engage in a kind of disappointment, noting that we had gotten into something quasi psychological and spiritualist. Using overlays that make teachers in relation to the claims of Samuel Hahnemann inherited from misinformation and lack of research, draw us to Hahnemann always sitting in an armchair by speculations on the principles of homeopathy. This, for those who enjoy speculation and believe themselves discoverers of something beyond human understanding, love to think of a Hahnemann that way. The truth is that, regardless of Hahnemann was also a polymath, he preferred grounded through observation and experience to obtain knowledge; so he said: “I believe more in the experience in my own intelligence.”
Far from the speculative, devious, philosophical, and lazy Hahnemann we paint at school, found through their writings rather a completely observer, recorder, active, experimental, scrupulous critic himself, trying to distort their own hypotheses. He, along with his best pupil, Dr. Boenninghausen, leave us a legacy that few are interested in studying; and in contrast, we find an educational system completely distorted what Hahnemann wanted to establish as a methodology into believing that Kent (and its derivatives) is in complete agreement with him.
After a while of graduates and after tinkering with estereotipándolos remedies with certain personalities of patients, peers, teachers and even parents, we begin to realize that our cup is full lowered effectiveness, if not very poor (at best, 30%, and that thanks to shots of luck). The best we can say is that our patients feel mentally better; like the work of a doctor was merely be a spiritual counselor or psychologist (that is with all due respect to professionals in psychology who I mean everything that has to do with personality disorders).
He had the privilege of meeting Dr. Gary Weaver, who with a distinguished career of over 30 years and having traveled the world visiting museums, libraries, and persons possessing original materials, has researched the true Hahnemanniana methodology. With great generosity, and aware of my interest in knowing the truth, he has shared with me his teachings and after a number of years of practice I am clear that what is taught as homeopathy Hahnemanniana in schools, ironically has nothing to do with Hahnemann simply because Kent did not follow its guidelines and therefore its methodology crowded with religious beliefs and moral prejudice is unsuccessful in most cases where it is applied. All I had to do to relearn and make a turn in my profession, was to accept the facts and teaching without prejudice, at the most consistent and appropriate tools.
Once one entrains on the rationale for Hahnemann, start noticing results. One begins to look more closely at the signs and most notable case and particular symptoms and begin to understand the correlation of their method to the structure, classification and organization of the rubrics in the repertory of Boenninghausen. The TPB is not only a repertoire, but a SYNOPSIS what the Hahnemannian method involves. Both teachers were in harmony and coordination to establish a guide for the homeopath to synthesize all that Hahnemann claimed and desired to convey.
In this sense, teachers accredited seminaries of the Institute for Homoeopathic Medicine, Dr. Gary Weaver, Vera Resnick and Dr. Guillermo Zamora, we use almost exclusively the Therapeutic Pocket Book 1846 (Version 2015 Polony & Weaver) in our daily homeopathic medical practice. And although occasionally one finds that the remedies may not seem the most suitable for the analysis, we find practical tools within the program to view Materia Medica and so do our homeopathic diagnosis.
On the other hand, the Institute for Homoeopathic Medicine has made public its disagreement with the deplorable situation which has led to homeopathy as a medical therapy but has also published for free key points of the truth of Hahnemann, doing translations and sharing material of great value to the homeopath who has a concern relearn and practice their profession from a medical angle efficient, safe, and accurate.
As a final thought, I express my deepest regret to conflict of interest we have closed the doors to impart methodology as defined according to Hahnemann. Some schools and laboratories in Mexico City in Guadalajara Jalisco and Oaxaca. They do not give back to IHM, they give to Hahnemann, and everything seems to indicate that his main interest is to continue autoerigiéndose as “Modern Gurus” and make policy through a medical system that only calls us to a target as indicates the aphorism 1 Organon of Medicine (6th edition.):
“The unique and important mission of the physician is to restore health to the sick, which is what is called cure”
The repertory used for analysis was the 2015 P & W Edition of the Therapeutic Pocket Book (original 1846 release) by Boenninghausen.
When the facts surrounding the safety and effectiveness of vaccines begin to be brought into the light, the only option left for those who manufacture, promote, and/or force vaccines onto the general population is to silence the presentation of those facts. Indeed, it is also imperative that those same forces prevent any alternatives to vaccination and financially incentivized medical dogma from becoming known amongst the general public.
Such was the mode of attack taken by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission in a case that dates back to 2013 against the homeopathic remedies company, Homeopathy Plus. In the early part of 2013, the ACCC instituted Federal Proceedings against Homeopathy Plus after claiming that the company was guilty of being “misleading and deceptive” after posting a series of three articles on its website that presented the Pertussis vaccine as being ineffective in preventing the disease and largely unreliable.
The Ministry of Truth also known as the ACCC also targeted the company due to their claims that homeopathic remedies are a safe and effective alternative to the vaccines. In addition, the ACCC has taken legal action against Homeopath Frances Sheffield.
The decision to take action against the company came months after the ACCC admits that the company removed the articles in question, yet the ACCC continues to push for an injunction to have the claims removed from the website. In other words, the ACCC is waging an expensive legal battle (ostensibly with taxpayer money) to forcibly remove claims from a website where they have already been removed.
In addition, other Ministries of Truth, the type of which Western society is replete, the Therapeutic Goods Administration Advertising Complaint Resolution Panel (CRP) and the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) have issued orders of retraction against the company. Apparently removing information deemed unsuitable for the field slaves was not enough. The serfs must be re-educated in the proper manner and be instructed as to the inaccuracy of the articles questioning the veracity of the all-knowing Australian government and medical establishment – two institutions which have, together, been responsible for numerous unethical experiments on indigenous Australian peoples and the utter destruction of their lifestyle and cultures.
Regardless, because Homeopathy Plus refused to comply with the retraction orders of one of the innumerable government “oversight” agencies of the Australian government, the ACCC filed its cased in Federal court.
Not surprisingly, the court sided with the “regulatory agencies,” i.e. the pharmaceutical companies and ruled that the claims of the article were indeed misleading and inaccurate.
While the evidence actually suggests that the Pertussis vaccine is neither safe nor effective in preventing Whooping Cough, facts never get in the way of Government/Corporate collusion or politicized science.
As ArsTechnica reported, the court ruled that “In fact, the Vaccine is effective in protecting a significant majority of people who are exposed to the whooping cough infection from contracting whooping cough.”
The court also criticized any claims that homeopathic remedies might help in preventing Whooping Cough. It stated that the articles posted on the companies’ website “made false or misleading representations that Homeopathic Treatments have a use or benefit” in preventing pertussis infection.
The penalties facing Homeopathy Plus will be decided after a hearing in February 2015 as will be the possibility of any future injunctive orders that might be issued.
Brandon Turbeville is an author out of Florence, South Carolina. He has a Bachelor’s Degree from Francis Marion University and is the author of six books, Codex Alimentarius — The End of Health Freedom, 7 Real Conspiracies, Five Sense Solutions and Dispatches From a Dissident, volume 1and volume 2, and The Road to Damascus: The Anglo-American Assault on Syria. Turbeville has published over 300 articles dealing on a wide variety of subjects including health, economics, government corruption, and civil liberties. Brandon Turbeville’s podcast Truth on The Tracks can be found every Monday night 9 pm EST at UCYTV. He is available for radio and TV interviews. Please contact activistpost (at) gmail.com.