Monthly Archives: February 2015

Moving forward with Hahnemann

Over the last few months the Institute for homeopathic medicine has presented argumentation for the practice of homoeopathy to be conducted in accord with the tenets of the Hahnemannian directive exclusively.

For those that have taken the time to do research they have been convinced that the ongoing Kentian methodology is at odds with the practice of Hahnemannian homoeopathy. Sadly the numbers of people that have done this is few. The medical practice of homoeopathy in existence today in the main is following a very dangerous, non-productive and false path under the banner of being a practitioner of homoeopathic medicine.

In the post presented yesterday regarding a specialist cancer treatment centre in Switzerland, there are many questions for the thinking practitioner to ask himself. It is long been our experience that just because a clinic, a group or a medical facility present themselves as specialising in homoeopathy and claiming to treat the patient in a homoeopathic manner does not mean that this is the reality. On the one hand the therapy is moving towards a quasi-scientific, bad psychology/spiritual and doctrine of signatures approach with the sensation method, and on the other hand the orthodox medical fraternity who practice under the banner of homoeopathy also use allopathic methods and treatments in their practice.

It is not for us to get involved in fighting these practices, it is for us to point out Hahnemann’s directions and methodology of treatment that constitutes the real practice of homoeopathy. Our organisation is for research and teaching the application of Hahnemann’s methodology for the benefit of the patient and of the accurately observing physician to facilitate a curative action in the most accurate and proven way. We will not be party to these false practices or the Swedenborgian overlay as promoted by Kent and Hering which contributed mightily to the decline of homoeopathic practice at the turn of the 20th century.

The clinical application of the Hahnemannian model for the practice of applying the law of similars, utilising the collected works of the materia Medica is in danger of being destroyed right now by the false practices in existence. There is nothing left to defend about the practice in the public eye while these false practices exist. It’s time to take a stand, go and read the Organon again without the Kentian overlay and knuckle down to some serious understanding. Without it your days as a practitioner, are not beneficial to the vast majority of patients you treat and will have a limited lifespan of ability to practice. The choice has always been yours.

So many questions………

Presentation of some oncological cases cured in the Clinica Santa Croce (Orselina, Switzerland) Spinedi

During the last 16 years 10 medical doctors cured hundreds of patients affected by cancers in our clinic. Mostly of the patients are staying in the clinic during 2-3 weeks and get every day the remedy in Q(LM) Potency. Daily the doctor and the supervisor study the reaction of the patient to the given remedy and decide if it is correct or not. During this time we establish a plane of cure and the patient is cured at home. The contact is maintained by phone, e-mail, skype.

The following cases demonstrate how we are working in our Clinic.

Case Nr. 1 (Dr. Dario Spinedi) Ewing Sarcoma of the left shoulder: 23-years old man Therapy and follow up. Operation could not be performed in the sound tissue.

He received only 4 cycles of chemotherapy.

After this he received only homoeopathy. The totality of the symptoms and the symptoms of the side effects of the chemotherapy pointed to Phosphorus.

Start of the therapy 13.12.1998:

Phos Q6 to Q10.

Then according to the Kent scale: Phos M, M, XM, XM, CM, M, M, etc. at long Intervals.

Up to the present time he is very well Time of observation 15 years Observation When the patient received chemotherapy we administrated Q-Potencies (many people say instead of Q-Potencies „LM-Potencies“) (we had the great privilege to have the handmade Q-Potencies by Dr. Jost Künzli and Dr. Pierre Schmidt of the most important remedies).

When the patient was better (he had no more macroscopic cancer) and no more chemotherapy then we gave the remedies in C-Potencies according to the scale of Kent.

Constitutional remedy and cancer remedy were the same: Phosphorus : Q-Potencies The last 16 years we have found out that these potencies are the best in the following cases: – During the chemotherapy and the radiation (we give the remedy daily together with the chemo- and radiotherapy) – In very advanced cases – To test quickly if the remedy is correct or not Great advantages We can give the remedy every day without homeopathic aggravation and so diminish the side effects of the chemo- and radiotherapy Difficulties

Many doctors don‘t know the correct rules how to give the Q-potencies. They don‘t understand the reaction after the remedy and the correct interpretation.

We need a very exact control (in the clinic we daily control the reactions of the given remedy)

Case Nr. 2 (Dr. Spinedi)

Malignant sacral teratoma not operable with multiple liver and lung Metastasis in a 2,5 years old girl.

Therapy and follow up Beginning of the cure with Phosphorus and some cycles chemotherapy.

Quick disappearing of all metastasis and the tumor get smaller so that he can be operated.

After this only homoeopathy from the 09.12.1999 with Phos Q3 to Q30, This mean 27 bottles of Phosphorus Q.

After this twice Phosphorus M. Some new important symptoms pointed to Sepia. Prescription: Sep M Sep M Sep XM, last remedy 24.03.2003.

Since then the young girl is well  Time of observation: 14 years

Phosphorus was helpful during 4 years to treat the side effects of the chemotherapy.

We are grateful to Dr. Grimmer that he gave to homoeopathic doctors the main remedies to antidote the side effect of radiation: Phosphorus, Cadmium sulfuricum, X-Ray, Radium bromatum, Fluoric acidum, Silicea, Cadmium iodatum.

Case Nr. 3 (Dr. Spinedi)

Inoperable sarcoma of uterus in a 50 years old women

Therapy and follow up Chemotherapy only 5 cycles 19.08.1999 together with Sepia Q6 – Q20.

The sarcoma became quickly smaller, could then be operated and radiated.

The patient felt well all the time during the cure and increased 10 kg in weight, before starting the therapy she was cachectic. Two doses of Radium Bromatum C30 for the side effects of the radiation, because she developed the symptoms of this remedy.

Then we continued with Sepia Q21 until to Q22.

Nux vomica M and XM helped much for gastritis due to medicines.

Because we had no more cancer in the body we started according to Kent: Sepia M, M, XM, XM, CM, CM at long intervals between 2000 and 2003.

Then appeared the symptoms of Thuja. We administered Thuja XM, XM, CM. After this the symptoms of Sepia M appeared again.

So we gave this remedy up to the present. She is very well. Time of observation: 14 years Observation The constitutional remedy Sepia needed the help of the great antisycotic Thuja to complete the cure.

To cure the side effects of radiation we needed in this case Radium bromatum, and for the side effects of chemotherapy Nux vomica. In every case we always try to work according to the law of similar and look for all the symptoms in the repertory

Case Nr. 4 (Dr. Spinedi)

Inoperable cancer of liver in a boy of 1 year During the 9th month there is a stop in the development of the child. It was diagnosed a great cancer of the liver, only 2 mm of normal liver tissue.

Therapy and follow up Start of the cure with Lycopodium Q3 (totality of the symptoms). But the symptoms of the child, pain and vomiting didn‘t ameliorate.

Start of a chemotherapy together with Phosphorus Q3 – Q24 from18.02.2003 until 30.03.2004.

The tumor became smaller and could be operated. The very high transaminases (over 1000) became better with the only administration of Phosphorus.

At the 24.02.2004 the symptoms of Lycopodium appeared, especially mentally (he is very disobedient, obstinate and dictatorial), therefore we give Lycopodium Q3 – Q20 at 06.12.2004.

Because all the laboratory findings are better and there is no more cancer we started with Lycopodium M, M, XM, XM, CM, CM etc. at long intervals up to the present time.

The young men is very well. Time of observation: 10 years Repertorisation We can see, that the totality of the symptoms point from the beginning to the two remedies Lycopodium and Phosphorus. Observation We always see the great effect of Phosphorus during the chemotherapy and long after. But in this case too, we need the constitutional remedy to finish the case. The constitutional remedy Lycopodium could not help in the beginning, but Phosphorus and THE chemotherapy together helped quickly. The mother dreamt during the pregnancy that her child would die during his first year of life. During the pregnancy she had three episodes with very great anger supressed.



case at:

  1. I can’t argue with the results of the remedy given, except it looks to me like there is a way to go before you could claim a complete cure judging from the photographs.

    I can’t find the sx that clinched the choice of Thuja for them. The feeling that the limbs are fragile, made of glass or wood, is not in the proving in MMP or in the TPB.
    Where did that sx come from? Its supposed to be a keynote of Thuja, but isn’t in the proving? Warts are the province of many remedies. So if you leave out the glass sx what do you get?

    I used rubrics:


    The top remedies to consider then are Calc, Sep, Sulph and Rhus t.

    What are the modalites and details of the fever? That would have helped to narrow the choice. As it is stated Heat with shuddering(chills). Would you use desire to uncover?

    it seems to me that the Drs. heard the sx: fear that the limbs might break like glass, added the Warts and settled on Thuja, without considering any of the other sxs. Thuja isn’t in cracks and rhagades for instance. What about the fever sxs? The constipation from hard feces? The thirst? Thuja had an action, but it seems like it was just luck that it did. Would Sep. or Rhus t have acted as well? I think so. And they would have been chosen according to the rules Hahnemann set down in the Organon and the proper use of the TPB to find the most likely remedies.

    So, why question a case with a reaction like they had? What if another patient comes along and has the same “keynote” symptom and Thuja didn’t do anything? What would they do then? That’s the weakness of the keynote, Kentian approach. If you follow Hahnemann’s tried and true method you come from a place of certainty. You have a procedure to fall back on that can be replicated. You consider the relevant characteristic sxs of the disease being treated and match the remedy’s characteristic sxs from the provings in the MMP ad CD as closely as possible.

    A medicine’s similarity is a question of degree. You are looking for the most similar, but several remedies could have an effect, its a question of degree of similarity. Its most important to have method that is consistent and repeatable and that is what Hahnemann gave us, if only we would DO IT THE WAY HE SAID TO DO IT!

A case of stasis eczema with dyshidrosis.

© Dr. Rajneesh Kumar Sharma MD (Homoeopathy)
Dr. (Km) Ruchi Rajput BHMS

Mrs. NA, Female- 45 years, Date of consultation- 02-05-2011

Presenting Complaints

This lady presented with marked swelling, redness and severe burning pain in both the legs and feet for a week. There was cellulitis with deep cracks and scaling in pedal region. These all were accompanied by violent itching felt in depth of the skin, high fever and chills.

Clinical history

She was much restless, thirsty for large quantities of cold water at large intervals, constipated with no urging for three days, hard, dry stool, having high grade fever with chills, with no desire to cover the legs. She was multiparous, normotensive, non diabetic, cheerful, talkative and postmenopausal lady. Preferred to be in company and fearful of touching the feet with anybody as if it were break into pieces. This was the marked and peculiar symptom noted.

Past History

She was having recurrent history of swelling of feet and legs for last three years. This was worse on standing and sitting for an hour or more. Swellings accompanied with itching with pitting oedema. Has had chicken pox in childhood, typhoid 10 years back and developed tiny warts on neck for a year.

Clinical diagnosis

Stasis eczema with dyshidrosis with cellulitis suppurativa

Clinical analysis

Based on history of warts and peculiar symptom of sensation of brittleness of legs, Thuja seems to be the remedy of choice.


Thuja 200 one dose stat followed by placebo thrice daily.
Advise to keep the feet elevated and to cleanse with calendula mother tincture twice daily.


Complete cure with a single dose within a week.


U.S. HHS is Going for More Vaccinations during Pregnancy, Employer-enforced adult vaccination requirements, and, probably, Faith-based groups to uptake vaccinations

Catherine J. Frompovich
Activist Post

The U.S. Health and Human Services published a 46-page draft proposal and notice in the Federal Register recently regarding more mandated vaccines for adults, and especially pregnant females; employer-enforced adult vaccinations; and probably for getting faith-based groups to uptake and not oppose vaccines/vaccinations.

There is an open public comment period that ends March 9, 2015, for consumers to register their comments, etc. per instructions at this website.

How to file your comments

Electronic responses are preferred and may be addressed

Written responses should be addressed to: National Vaccine Program Office, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 200 Independence Avenue SW., Room 733G, Washington, DC 20201. Attn: HHS Adult Immunization c/o Rebecca Fish.The opening paragraph of the Executive Summary of the “National Adult Immunization Plan”draft dated February 5, 2015 says,
Vaccination is considered one of the most important public health achievements of the 20th century and continues to offer great promise in the 21st century. Vaccines save lives and improve the quality of life by preventing serious infectious diseases and their consequences. However, the benefits of vaccination are not realized equally across the U.S. population. Adult vaccination rates remain low in the United States, and significant racial and ethnic disparities also exist. [1]

Probably, nothing is more blatantly ridiculous and scientifically incorrect than the very first sentence. Infectious disease after disease waned to extremely low levels of almost no infection and contraction rates numerous years before 20th century vaccines were even invented. This website contains more than two dozen charts and graphs indicating those documented historical facts.
However, vaccine makers unabashedly take credit for something that has become more of a health problem than a scientific advancement, in my opinion. All vaccines are super-saturated with horrendous neurotoxins and other toxic chemicals, non-human animal-source DNA, unknown viruses, fetal cell lines—aka diploid cells, and mycoplasmas, plus other ‘ingredients’—probably genetically-engineered-nanoparticles, which I discuss in detail in my 2013 book Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines.

Readers may want to know/have the peer-review published science papers cited in the book in order to corroborate damage vaccines and their ingredients cause, as part of their comments to the above HHS request.

Apparently and according to the HHS’s National Vaccine Plan (NVP),
While the NVP provides a vision for improving protection from vaccine-preventable diseases across the lifespan, vaccination coverage levels among adults are not on track to meet Healthy People 2020 targets. The National Vaccine Advisory Committee and numerous stakeholder groups have emphasized the need for focused attention on adult vaccines and vaccination.That’s what the new Federal Register publication is all about! Apparently, the feds want adults to get as many vaccines as MDs are pumping into children.

The NAIP [National Adult Immunization Plan] is a five-year national plan. As a national plan, it will require engagement from a wide range of stakeholders to achieve its full vision. The plan emphasizes collaboration and prioritization of efforts that will have the greatest impact. The NAIP also aims to leverage the unique opportunity presented by the implementation of the Affordable Care Act. [Also known as “ObamaCare”]There are four key goals they want to establish by 2020 with the NAIP:
Goal 1: Strengthen [obviously mandate and enforce] the adult immunization infrastructure. Goal 2: Improve access to adult vaccines. [Have MDs hound adults to take vaccines like they do parents about kids’ vaccines.] Goal 3: Increase community demand for adult immunizations. [An interesting remark?] Goal 4: Foster innovation [What does that mean and can innovation include more toxins in vaccines than there are now? Could that mean nanoparticles or GMOs?] in adult vaccine development and vaccination-related technologies.[Technologies like getting vaccine patches or embedded RFID chips containing vaccines?]According to the draft report, the following vaccines probably are being mandated for adults:
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that among US adults each year there are roughly 40,000 cases and 4,000 deaths attributable to invasive pneumococcal disease, between 3,000 and 50,000 deaths [see facts below] due to seasonal influenza, 9,000 cases of pertussis, approximately 3,000 cases of acute hepatitis B, and about one million cases of herpes zoster. Adults have also been affected in recent outbreaks of other vaccine-preventable diseases such as measles. With the aging of the U.S. population, the public health impact of vaccine-preventable diseases and their complications in adults is likely to grow. Thediminishing function of the aging immune system reduces the immune response to vaccination and underscores the need to develop more effective products for older adults. [CJF emphasis added]Facts about seasonal influenza:
On their own website, the CDC states that flu deaths between 1976 and 2006 ranged from a low of 3,000 people to a high of 49,000. But they also reported on their website that only 500 people died from flu in 2010. “The fact is, the outrageous claims of 3,000 to 49,000 deaths are inaccurate numbers,” says holistic family physician Dr. David Brownstein. “They are just guesswork.” [12] [CJF emphasis added]Is that a case of “Liar, liar—pants on fire?” So, how can anyone believe the CDC’s hyper- inflated statistics? So, in the draft flu deaths are up to 50,000—a nice round figure!

What neither HHS, the CDC/FDA, nor anyone associated with the vaccine industry will admit to, I contend, is this: With all the vaccines they have mandated for children since the middle 1980s—supposedly for entry into schools—they have – either accidentally or deliberately – created reduced-functioning immune systems that cannot perform in the manner Nature and life intends and genetically programs.

Vaccine makers, in effect, have created what they think is ‘immunity’, which actually is an antigen response that, consequently, can produce inflammatory processes in the body, including the brain. An apparent end result is deficient immune systems as children grow into adulthood and older. Chronic “old-age diseases” now are plaguing young children! See “Coping with Chronic Illnesses in Childhood and Adolescence” (2012) .

“Diminishing function of the aging immune system” clearly will result in—and federally require—periodic re-vaccination in order to effectuate Big Pharma’s vaccination-produced acquired immune system, which apparently malfunctions, in my opinion. How many fully-vaccinated individuals contract the very diseases for which they are vaccinated? [11] How many children have allergies, asthma, and other immune problems? See allergy stats here. Wow!

The diminishing function of the aging immune system is an unfortunate health status that results, I think, from decades of HHS, CDC, FDA, Congress, and the media apparently believing—plus promoting—‘tobacco-science’ produced by Big Pharma, that’s propagated by corporate money and lobbyists, in my opinion.

By injecting toxins into newborn infants, then babies at 2, 4, and 6 months of age, and toddlers during the timeline when the human immune system is not fully developed—that happens for a child between two and three years of age—federal health agencies basically have ‘castrated’ almost two generations of individuals’ immune systems, thereby leaving them susceptible to diminishing functions of the immune system and contracting infectious communicable diseases—even when vaccinated—as current statistics are proving. A good percentage of those contracting communicable diseases are fully vaccinated! Now, the feds are going after “catch-up” vaccinations for adults, thinking that will help, as discussed in the Introduction of the report on page 1.

Nevertheless, this information needs to be ‘digested’:
As shown in Table 1, despite the health benefits that result from implementation of ACIP recommendations, adults continue to be vaccinated at low and variable rates. In contrast, childhood vaccination rates in the United States typically exceed 90 percent. [As a result, we have sicker kids than ever before, plus the Autism rate is 1 in 50, whereas in the late 1970s, that rate was 1 in 10,000! Furthermore, more vaccinees are contracting vaccinated-against diseases that the feds want to blame either on unvaccinated children or now, adults!] The success of childhood vaccination[Can one call so much Autism success?] can be attributed to many factors unique to pediatric vaccination, such as state laws requiring vaccination for school entry and the coordinated public health infrastructure established by the Vaccines for Children Program (VFC), a federally funded program to provide free vaccines to children who are Medicaid eligible, uninsured, underinsured, or American Indian or Alaskan Native.Another reason for the high rates of vaccination among children is that pediatricians and family physicians, the primary providers of health care and preventive health services for children, have long been committed to making immunization a core part of well-child care. [Probably, those ‘well baby’ visits after birth should be called something else because so many children become damaged after receiving vaccines. Check the VAERS reports!]On page 3 of the HHS draft, and throughout, reference is made to “stakeholder groups”. Just who are they? Furthermore, aren’t the largest “stakeholders” involved, all adults in the USA? Furthermore, I’m questioning the effect citizens’ comments and input will have, since the draft is written as something that’s a given—fait accompli! In reading the draft, readers can learn what “barriers” those stakeholder groups and researchers discuss.

It seems the Affordable Care Act [aka “ObamaCare”] has been more than influential regarding mandatory adult vaccinations. “In addition, passage of the Affordable Care Act in 2010 was an important milestone for adult vaccination in the United States. …. Furthermore, more than 71 million individuals in private plans have gained expanded access to vaccinations and other preventive services coverage without cost-sharing under the Affordable Care Act.23” [Pg.4]

This, on page 4, is rather interesting:
In 2014, NVAC published updated Standards for Adult Immunization Practice to emphasize that all providers who care for adults are responsible for assessing immunization needs at every clinical encounter, strongly recommending needed vaccines, administering recommended vaccines, and documenting receipt in a state immunization information system. The standards also instruct providers who do not vaccinate to refer adult patients to a vaccinating provider.[CJF emphasis added]And this:
Medicare beneficiaries may encounter financial barriers when accessing vaccines covered by Medicare Part D (e.g., herpes zoster vaccine and tetanus,diphtheria, and pertussis [Tdap] vaccine). Medicare Part B covers select vaccines without cost-sharing; however, cost-sharing for vaccines covered under Medicare Part D varies widely from plan to plan and may be cost-prohibitive for some patients. [Pg.4] [CJF emphasis added]However, following is an area/arena where the plan probably will encounter resistance:
The success of this plan will depend on the synergies between state, local, territorial, and tribal governments; health care providers; advocacy groups; vaccine manufacturers; academia and research organizations; payers and health plans; employers; and the general public to work together to overcome barriers and improve access to adult vaccinations. [Pp.5-6]RAND Corporation [8] was enlisted to review historic literature, interview stakeholders, and collect data to identify plan priorities and key indicators. [Pg.8]The feds apparently expect this plan to produce Healthy People by 2020. Well, if I can offer a forecast, I think it will be this: The USA will have such an overabundance of dreadfully seriously sick citizens, from all age groups, that no one will know what to do. However, senior citizens—75 and older—probably will be mandated by law to be subject to compulsory and legal euthanasia. Do you think that’s in ObamaCare too?

Pregnant females are being targeted very prominently.
In addition, NVAC provides forward-looking analyses to identify barriers and challenges to research and development of new vaccines specifically for pregnant women. [Pg.10]Interestingly, HHS submits this under Goal 1 on page 11:
Objective 1.3 Continue to analyze claims filed as part of the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) to identify potential causal links between vaccines and adverse events.That is nothing short of a ‘sham’, in this writer’s opinion. Causal links between vaccines have been identified in the past by CDC epidemiologists and researchers, viz.: the Simpsonwood Meeting in June of 2000—a clandestine meeting to figure out what to do with the Verstraeten studythat showed the link between thimersol (ethylmercury) in vaccines and Autism.

US Media Blackout: 
Italian Court Rules Vaccines Cause Autism
Recent Italian Court Decisions on Vaccines and Autism

Then, as recently as 2014, William Thompson, PhD, blew the whistle on how he fudged vaccine study papers regarding the link between vaccines and Autism.

So, can the CDC be trusted to identify causal links between vaccines and adverse events and correct them since, apparently, past history has proven they conspire to hide them?

On Page 12 under Objective 1.2, this appears:
Vaccines have a long track record of safety and effectiveness in adults…Are they kidding—seriously? Furthermore, safety tests are not performed by the FDA on vaccines! Back in 1976, the flu vaccine was involved in a memorable number of adverse events:
However, side-effects from the vaccine are thought to have caused five hundred cases of Guillain–Barré syndrome and 25 deaths. [2]According to the authors of the book The Swine Flu Affair, contracting paralyzing Guillain-Barré syndrome is 11 times greater with vaccination than without. [2]

However, there just may be a perfect example of how the CDC/FDA licenses supposedly ‘safe’ vaccines. What happened with the Rotavirus RotaShield vaccine should never have happened IFthe FDA did its own safety testing with outside independent scientists, and not take manufacturers’ ‘tobacco science’, in my opinion. So how safe was that Rotavirus vaccine for children?

Rotavirus: First Vaccine Withdrawn

The first vaccine for rotavirus, a common cause of severe childhood diarrheal illness, RotaShield, was licensed and recommended for routine childhood immunization in 1998. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, however, withdrew the vaccine in 1999 due to safety concerns. Scientists associated the vaccine with a rare intestinal problem called intussusception, a potentially fatal telescoping of part of the bowel. [3]Furthermore,
According to the CDC in 1999, rotavirus was causing 20 to 40 infant deaths annually in the US when the first rotavirus vaccine, RotaShield, was introduced. It was estimated that about 50,000 hospitalizations occurred in the US because of severe diarrhea and dehydration. [9] [CJF emphasis added]Vaccine safety is not a given truth nor a fact! See the VAERS adverse events reports, which statistically represent between 1 and 10 percent of adverse reactions reported, since doctors apparently are lax to report vaccine damage. It’s considered “coincidental”. Many vaccinees are harmed by mandatory vaccinations, as numerous photographs at the end of this article graphically verifies. Be prepared for upsetting photos of children damaged very badly.

No one — babies, toddlers, teens, adults or senior citizens — should be mandated to receive toxins injected into their bodies that can create such horrendous health conditions or even the paralyzing Guillain–Barré–Strohl syndrome.

Constitutional attorney Jonathan Emord tells how the FDA approved one drug in this video.  Do you believe how that drug was approved? No real studies were done!

On Page 13, we find this,
Determine the data needs to evaluate vaccine safety and monitor efficacy in pregnant women and newborns and the ability of these systems to capture relevant data, …which I think is most disconcerting insofar as, when I studied nutrition and consumer health, pregnant women were told not to take any types of medication at all—not even aspirin! [10]

Again, I’d like to make a prediction: Newborns will have more health problems than at any time in medical history! Between vaccines given to pregnant mothers, which probably will cross the placental wall, and all the ultrasound frequencies from as early as 6 to 7 weeks in pregnancy, babies surely are going to birth with more ‘fried’ brains than ever. Ultrasound/sonograms can cause cavitation in brain cells.
A rise in temperature of fetal tissue—especially since the expectant mother cannot even feel it—might not seem alarming, but temperature increases can cause significant damage to a developing fetus’s central nervous system, according to research. [4] [CJF emphasis added]Then, inject Hepatitis B vaccines within 24 hours after infants are born…OMG! Personally, as a retired healthcare professional, I’m compelled to ask, “Do they really know what they are doing?”

In the draft they talk about resolving vaccine injury claims and VEARS in several places. However, the track record at the “Vaccine Court” is less than admirable or equitable, I’d say. As of the end of fiscal 2014, there were 3,540 claims paid but 9,734 were dismissed—almost a 3 to 1 ratio of vaccine adverse events claims NOT paid. And, when that happens to you or your child, you are saddled for life with medical bills that are unimaginable! [5]

On Page 15, we read where employers will be involved in making certain adults are vaccinated.
1.6.2. Encourage employers to offer and promote adult immunization using evidence on economic impact.


The most immediate impact from an employer perspective may be with seasonal influenza immunization campaigns, but efforts here offer the possibility of expanding to other vaccines recommended for adults.


Encourage on-site, occupational health vaccination clinics and involvement of employers to increase employee vaccination rates. [Your place of employment may become a nightmare of prodding proselytization and probable jabbing with needles.]Under the topic “Increase Community Demand for Adult Immunizations,” we find that there apparently will be constant ‘badgering’ campaigns to receive vaccinations. Numerous pages about “how to” indicate that it’s going to be unavoidable, plus probably “in-your-face” too, and everywhere!

Probably, the most frightening statement, in my opinion, is found on Page 24:
One of the five goals of the NVP is to develop new and improved vaccines.First of all, there are too many vaccines now that are harmful. Furthermore, what will Pharma produce in the future when everyone will have to receive vaccines for which Big Pharma have no legal liability to produce safe vaccines or vaccines that are tested for their abilities to produce cancer, interfere with fertility/cause infertility, or cause birth defects? Currently, NO vaccines are tested for those health adverse events. Every vaccine package insert states that those tests have not been done! So, how are vaccines proven to be safe, if we don’t know if they can cause cancer, especially since they contain numerous toxic chemicals? Good question?

Here’s another prediction I’m offering: Everyone in the USA will have to get a vaccination a day! Maybe two, since there are hundreds of new vaccines in developmental pipelines from what I know.
Implementing the NAIP will require not just federal action, but also national action. [Pg.26]By 2020, the feds want 100 percent of all pharmacists administering vaccines! [Pg.29]

In the draft’s base year of 2012, only 45 percent of adults received a provider-recommended flu shot; whereas by 2020, they want 90 percent compliance! Flu vaccines apparently don’t fare very high in efficacy ratings or safety for children or adults. (Source)

When I read this on Page 31, I shouted, “WHAT?”
*Note that the published immunization schedule does not include 2014 ACIP recommendations related to the use of 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine and 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine among adults aged ≥65 years.Additionally, valents in a vaccine refer to an antigen or organism for a specific disease. So, a 13-valent vaccine means 13 antigens, while the 23-valent vaccine means 23 antigens! Antigens usually are associated with aluminum in order to produce/acquire ‘an adaptive immune response’ [6]—in any combination of four formulations: Aluminum hydroxide, Aluminum hydroxyphosphate sulfate, Aluminum phosphate, and Aluminum potassium sulfate.
Vaccines may be monovalent (also called univalent) or multivalent (also calledpolyvalent). A monovalent vaccine is designed to immunize against a single antigen or single microorganism.[16] A multivalent or polyvalent vaccine is designed to immunize against two or more strains of the same microorganism, or against two or more microorganisms. [7]There is a lot at stake in the HHS draft regarding vaccines that needs to be considered very carefully from all angles and by everyone, I think. Many adults have acquired immunity from having contracted infectious childhood diseases and should not be vaccinated, if that’s the case. There are blood tests that can establish one’s immunity to infectious diseases—rather than risk toxic vaccine ingredients, which everyone ought to know about. I’ve listed them here:

There also are tests for polio and yellow fever.

Source of above test information is

Additional information about Vaccine Titer Tests appears here.

Please don’t forget to send in your comments before March 9, 2015 to the CDC about their draft proposal for mandatory adult vaccinations. Refer to the third paragraph at the beginning of this article for submission instructions.



Julie gerberdingManaging Editor’s Note: We ran this post in February, 2011. It seems Jan – Mar is the PR lead up to autism “awareness month” whereby Americans must be reminded (with a hammer to the head) that vaccine injury does not happen, nor is autism association with vaccination.  Dr. Paul Offit’s books debut each winter like the Groundhog wriggling out of his grotto – Offit’s goal of course is to protect vaccination while smearing autism and vaccine safety community members.  This year even Autism Speaks – The Blue Bomb of autism told Americans to vaccinate their children, amidst the measles hype.

Dr. Julie Gerberding was the Head of the CDC. She left, and within a year, became President of the Vaccine Division for MERCK (makers of the MMRII and Gardasil vaccines.)  In December she received a promotion to Executive Vice President for Strategic Communications, Global Public Policy and Population Health.    Read that title again. “Strategic communications.” Think about the intense media hype around the 100+ cases of measles, a disease that was so common and non-threatening that TV sitcoms like The Brady Bunch and Married with Children poked fun at transmission.   Here’s some strategic communication from our John Stone – it was Dr. Gerberding who…

It wasn’t Andrew Wakefield who said vaccines cause autism Mr Gates, it was Julie Gerberding…and she told Sanjay Gupta

By John Stone

“Now, we all know that vaccines can occasionally cause fevers in kids. So if a child was immunized, got a fever, had other complications from the vaccines. And if you’re predisposed with the mitochondrial disorder, it can certainly set off some damage. Some of the symptoms can be symptoms that have characteristics of autism. “

Julie Gerberding, present head of Merck’s vaccine division speaking to Sanjay Gupta on the subject of the Hannah Poling case when she was still head of the Centers for Disease Control.

The one thing Sanjay Gupta’s interview with Bill Gates on Friday did not do was add to informed, intelligent discussion about vaccine safety. What we undoubtedly had was a commercial for Bill Gates’s global vaccine programme, and the repetition of a lot of unpleasant allegations about Andrew Wakefield which do not bear examination.  Perhaps the single point that he most has to answer if he wants to say that kind of thing is to explain how Wakefield could have changed data under the noses of 12 senior specialist/consultants, who then failed to say anything about it for 13 years or more, despite the continuing controversy. And by the way Gupta has to answer it too. Just because these things were claimed in a once respectable medical journal does not mean that they are remotely credible. What Gates says contradicts what Gerberding told Gupta, and what Wakefield told Gupta.  It was also not what he heard from John Poling (HERE ). So Gupta should not be sitting there like a block of wood saying nothing: it leads to mistrust.

Let’s just examine briefly the implications of what Gerberding said in that interview three years ago.  According to a CDC study from 2006 (HERE ) 33 out 1800 infants (nearly 2%) suffered a fever of 39.5 or higher, although there was no long term follow up. By now it is also established the mitochondrial dysfunction is a common feature in autistic children and much higher than in the general population (JAMA Mito Dysfunction in Autism ,  and Mitochondrial dysfunction can connect the diverse medical symptoms associated with autism spectrum disorders , Novel plasma phospholipid biomarkers of autism: mitochondrial dysfunction as a putative causative mechanismMitochondrial dysfunction in autism spectrum disorders: a population-based study ). Commonly adverse reactions are not monitored or investigated in any detail – it is left to families to bring legal actions – if they dare, or have the energy left. So actually we have no means of tracing the impact of vaccines on this issue. As Bernardine Healy, a former National Institute of Health director, warned on CBS news you cannot actually rule it out unless you study sub-groups (CBS News HERE ).

However, despite all the obstacles the US vaccine court has paid out more than $2b on MMR and DPT related claims since 1988 (HERE ), although claimants are well advised to stress neurological impairment rather than autism, which is a non-specific  psychiatric diagnosis  (HuffPo HERE ).

The most likely reading is that only a tiny percentage of cases ever get compensated, but even if they were the only cases Gates would be guilty of perpetuating a fairy story: on the best reading vaccines are only relatively safe, meanwhile the fact that they can cause autism has been conceded by the US government both on the legal and scientific front: a more pertinent question in the circumstances is “how often?”.

One thing I regret about Gates’s intervention is the blood libel against advocates of greater vaccine safety and caution: such events have not happened to his children so perhaps he should not really comment. Of course, it is very easy to design studies that do not find anything. Cochrane’s review of MMR sifted 5,000 studies, reviewed in detail 31 epidemiological studies (supposedly the best) and declared them to be “largely inadequate”, against which the failure to detect any connection between the vaccine and autism must be measured .  The bare faced hostility manifested against ordinary citizens reporting damage is suggestive of a bullying and unscientific attitude towards facts.

Gates has for long been reckoned one of the richest men in the world, and the most successful, if not the best, manufacturer of computer software. The success, above all, has been in making sure virtually everyone has to have his products. He now seems poised to try and repeat the success with vaccines, but unless he employs a lighter hand it is unlikely to be without much human damage.

John Stone is Contributing Editor for Age of Autism, in the UK.

Difficult Decisions

In the last few weeks we have received several requests to sign petitions on behalf of homeopathic projects. One petition  received (requested from several sources), was to ask the United Nations to recognise world homoeopathy day. Another one was to support a petition in France to prevent the banning of homeopathic medicines. Yet another was to support a project in Africa, and another was to support a charity clinic.

On the face of it these would seem reasonable requests and  quite innocuous. Yet a little reflection opened up a whole can of worms in a moral and ethical sense.

Firstly, in the West the majority of the current new graduate practitioners do not practice homeopathy in accord with the tenets of Samuel Hahnemann’s directions. I would go further and state that the majority of practitioners who have been through the private schools and colleges have not been taught Hahnemannian homoeopathy. In vogue today is the practice of the Sensation method as promoted by Rajan Sankaran and personality prescribing according to the Greek school. Both of these methods are based on the incorrect Kentian/Swedenborgian philosophy that is in direct conflict with the medical practice as defined by Hahnemann.

The Sensation method is a hodgepodge of crude psychology, bad medicine, interpretive analysis of scientific results in the materia Medica, and use of the doctrine of signatures.

The Greek school has adhered closely to the protocols as defined by James Tyler Kent, and in doing so has made personalities of medicines to define characteristics of people as opposed to using the materia Medica for collecting and matching symptoms of the nature of the disease as opposed to the person.

For us to support a petition for a world homoeopathy day, it would mean a support for the majority who practice homeopathy in the West in an incorrect manner, and therefore to the detriment of the patients that they claim to serve.

For us to support a petition to save the manufacture of remedies in France, firstly, we would like to address the issue of why France predominantly practices polypharmacy. We would also like to know why the largest supplier of homeopathic preparations Boiron is not at the forefront of this issue. Whilst it is very obvious that any ban on remedies would affect us as well, I still wonder if the availability of them is of benefit  in the hands of non-Hahnemannian homoeopaths to any great extent.

As for supporting external projects or charities, a quick look at the persons involved and their leaning towards practices as mentioned above would preclude us from offering financial support. Homoeopathy is based on the law of similars, and is very forgiving even in the hands of poorly trained individuals but who managed to give a medicine capable of producing a similar reaction in the person and thus elicit a curative response from time to time.

Sadly, as  those people deviate more and more from the Hahnemannian principles and into the interpretive type of homeopathic case taking, even these cures become part of a distant memory.

We also face the very real problem of homeopathic practice being regulated by individuals and groups who have seized power and been made into a quasi legal body acceptable to governments and thusly regulated by them according to their own tenets of operation. On this basis in the United States and Israel, a graduate cannot get onto the register of homoeopaths without passing an exam which contains questions pertaining to the Sensation method approach. Also in joining a Register a potential member is required to accept that there are many methods of practising homoeopathy and must support the right of any other member to practice as they see fit.

For all the above reasons the IHM generally do not offer financial or moral support to “homoeopathy”as practised today. We very clearly see that the profession has degenerated to the exact same position of false practice and lack of ethics and adherence to the proper principles of practice as in the beginning of the 20th century when it all but disappeared from mainstream usage. There has always been antipathy from medical bodies and the pharmaceutical industry but that is no excuse for practitioners to abandon the very clear instructions and methodology outlined for the practice.



All for money and control

Sad truth.

Federal Bill Announced to Eliminate All Vaccine Exemptions for Head Start

Vaccine Liberation Army reports:

Senator Barbara Boxer (D) and Representative Anna Eshoo (D-Palo Alto), have proposed federal legislation that would for the first time impose Federal, as opposed to State, vaccine mandates to attend an educational program. The legislators’ bill entitled A Head Start on Vaccinations Act would require all children enrolled in Head Start to get all of the vaccinations recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) according to the CDC’s timetable. There would be no exemptions for religious or personnel beliefs. READ MORE…AND TAKE ACTION

Indeed, Monterey Herald reports the ladies’ plan to introduce the federal bill next week. Alto tried to exercise her comedic abilities when she said, “This bill is a ‘booster shot’ for our nation’s vaccine policies and will mitigate the spread of deadly disease.” Get it?

They swooned “the genius” of American scientists for creating vaccines to eradicate polio and emphasize that this bill is necessary making sure over a million “of our children” are protected from deadly disease. But repeating the term “deadly disease” does not wipe out the fact that zero people have died from measles since the early 2000s, that many of the people who got measles from California were vaccinated, and that 108 people that we know of have died after getting measles vaccines. And the tragic results of the polio vaccine are a whole other story. And another.

Medical exemptions would still be allowed under the federal bill, but those are extremely rare and difficult to obtain.

Since writing about California’s proposal to eliminate any schoolchildren vaccine waivers for personal beliefs – it turns out, multiple states have either passed, or are in the process of moving similar bills through. Many of them surround tightening exemptions by requiring the parents to submit to a medical consult (intimidation, warning) before being allowed to opt their children out. Again, this is setting the stage for things to come. Exemptions were always viewed as “loopholes” from the start, with time limits set to “close the loop.”

And while New York has taken steps to expand exemptions, a federal bill can easily undo all of that.

Isn’t it interesting how an outbreak of measles, now on its way out in California, could have so many lawmakers at the helm ready to “take swift (permanent) action”? The infamous historical battle cry that precedes the complete loss of human rights and gains of abuse: We have to do something NOW! Because of A we must do B – it’s for the children! They sure do write quickly when they need to accomplish something.

One woman writing for Thinking Mom’s Revolution summarized some reasons why proposals for such new mandates are unsurprising, and why so many people never get to hear important medical information – my emphasis added:

One word: Profit. As of 1988, vaccine makers and the doctors who administer vaccines bear no liability for vaccine injury (23). They cannot be held accountable by law for adverse events from vaccination. In fact, the entire adverse event reporting system (VAERS) is voluntary! This means that the more aggressive our vaccine schedule, the more profitable it is for vaccine makers. But what about the Centers for Disease Control, don’t they direct the vaccines our children really need? Please note that the CDC uses worldwide disease data to formulate our policies, which makes no sense at all. How could one possibly compare a malnourished child living in unsanitary conditions and subsequently exposed to illness to a child exposed to that same illness in a first-world country? I invite parents to take a look at the resumes of some of the heads of pharmaceutical companies and members of the CDC like this one (24). One can very clearly see those in charge of vaccine policy have a dangerous conflict of interest with those who profit from that policy. Remember, pharmaceutical companies contributed $34 million dollars in campaign funds in 2014 (25). It would behoove anyone attempting office these days to err on the side of ‘big pharma.’

What a sweet gig! As Vaccine Liberation Army points out, there are over 200 new vaccines in the pipeline – do parents really want to risk losing the ability to refuse future potentially mandated vaccines? By corralling the public, and closing all exits, the government in tandem with pharmaceutical corps and their medical community underlings would have carte blanche over your body.

Add to that, the fact that nearly all media – currently spewing forceful vaccine tripe – in the U.S. is owned by “The Big Six” corporations. Who are some of their sponsors? And if Comcast finally succeeds in the planned merger with Time Warner, wouldn’t that take our big six down to “The Big Five”?

Media outlets have thrown any thin veil of credibility out the window. For instance, USA Today introducing the idea of jailing or suing parents for not vaccinating their children by posing it as a question in a headline. Before, no one would have thought to ask that. Even doctors with all of their prestige, cannot “opt-out” of playing ball. “Revoke the license of any doctor who opposes vaccination” says a widely-circulated Washington Post op-ed. Those media polls are to gauge YOU – and your reactions. So, it should come as no surprise that people who were merely in the thinking, searching, and health conscious kind of way, suddenly find themselves painted as a fabricated neo-conspiracy theorist.

Marxists like to comment on “the tyranny of choice” for consumers. Don’t you mean the illusion of choice? An American can barely choose what information they are allowed to hear, let alone a medical procedure they want – or don’t want.

– See more at: