Monthly Archives: May 2015

Thousands of teenage girls enduring debilitating illnesses after routine school cancer vaccination

‘I had severe chest and abdominal pains, and breathing difficulties – one time, I couldn’t move anything on one side of my body’
When Caron Ryalls was asked to sign consent forms so that her then 13-year-old daughter, Emily, could be vaccinated against cervical cancer, she assumed it was the best way to protect Emily’s long-term health.
Yet the past four years have turned into a nightmare for the family as Emily soon suffered side effects. Only two weeks after her first HPV injection, the teenager experienced dizziness and nausea. “The symptoms grew increasingly worse after the second and third injections, and I went to A&E several times with severe chest and abdominal pains as well as difficulty breathing,” Emily, now 17, said. “One time I couldn’t move anything on one side of my body. I didn’t know what was happening.” Emily is one of the thousands of teenage girls who have endured debilitating illnesses following the routine immunisation. She is yet to recover and has no idea when her health will return to normal. “Prior to the vaccination Emily had an ‘unremarkable’ medical history with no problems,” said Mrs Ryalls, 49, from in Ossett, West Yorkshire. “She was considered very healthy and represented the school at hockey, netball, athletics and was a keen dancer. She was also a high achiever at school, in the top sets for everything and predicted at least 10 GCSE with high grades. Her future was very bright.” Mrs Ryalls reported Emily’s condition to the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). In the 10 years to April this year the agency received almost 22,000 “spontaneous suspected” adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports in 13 routine immunisation categories including flu, MMR, tetanus, diphtheria and polio, according to a Freedom of Information response released earlier this month.vaccine1 In the HPV category alone, ADRs numbered 8,228, of which 2,587 were classified as “serious” – defined by several criteria, including whether it resulted in hospitalisation or was deemed life threatening. The MHRA said that the figures did not reflect the true amount of ADRs because of an “unknown and variable level of under-reporting”. The agency estimates it receives about 10 per cent of all reports, suggesting the actual number of girls suffering ADRs could be tens of thousands. It also said that “many millions” of the vaccinations were administered in this time frame without any problems reported. “Every visit to a doctor was met with rolled eyes,” said Mrs Ryalls. “Every mention of the HPV vaccination was met with hostility and ridicule. We were eventually referred to a local paediatrician who told her to push herself to get back to normal – ‘We all feel tired in the mornings, Emily’ was one of the remarks regarding her complete exhaustion.” Two years after falling ill, Emily was eventually referred to Dr Pradip Thakker at Queens Medical Centre in Nottingham; he used a tilt table test to diagnose PoTS (postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome), a condition where moving from lying down to standing up causes an abnormally high heart rate. By this time Emily was able to manage only three to four hours of school a week. Mrs Ryalls, who had built up a small publishing company from scratch, was forced to close it and become Emily’s full-time carer. Cancer Research UK points out that cervical cancer is the second most common cancer in women under the age of 35. In the UK, about 3,000 women a year are diagnosed with cervical cancer and it is estimated that about 400 lives could be saved every year as a result of vaccinating girls before they are infected with the human papilloma virus. The NHS says that the vaccine, which was introduced as part of the routine immunisation programme in 2008, protects against the two HPV types that cause 70 per cent of the cases of cervical cancer. Screening is still needed to try to pick up cervical abnormalities caused by other HPV types that could lead to cancer. Since September 2014, girls have received only two injections; the second is taken six to 24 months after the first. The NHS says the programme has proved to be “very effective”. However, other countries are taking action following reports of increasing numbers of girls suffering side effects. A Danish TV documentary broadcast earlier this year highlighted the large number of girls who appear to have been affected following their HPV vaccination. Some, like those the Ryalls have met in the UK, are now wheelchair-bound. Last year, Japan withdrew its recommendation for the HPV vaccine because of reported side effects. In an article published last week in the Springer journal Clinical Rheumatology, Dr Manuel Martinez-Lavin, who has been treating people with chronic pain conditions for more than 30 years, said these illnesses are “more frequent after HPV vaccination”. He wrote: “Vaccination has been one of the most effective public health measures in the history of medicine. However, seemingly inexplicit adverse reactions have been described after the injection of the newer vaccines vs human papillomavirus (HPV). Adverse reactions appear to be more frequent after HPV vaccination when compared to other type of immunisations.” Dr Martinez-Lavin said PoTS and fibromyalgia are among the diseases he believes have developed after HPV vaccination, and that clinicians should be aware of the possible association between HPV vaccination and the development of these “difficult to diagnose” painful syndromes. Mrs Ryalls and about 80 families in similar situations across the UK are taking action. They have formed the Association for HPV Vaccine Injured Daughters (AHVID) to bring families with girls adversely affected by the HPV vaccine together. She said: “We want to have a stronger voice and we are pushing hard for regional treatment and assessment centres along the lines of Denmark and Japan. We want increased reporting of adverse reactions, better educational support and greater transparency and information to enable parents to make an informed decision regarding consent to HPV vaccination.” Mrs Ryalls also said the AHVID wants better research and treatment for the girls’ conditions and that treatment is currently “pot luck”, as too few doctors spot the signs of PoTS and other autoimmune conditions. “I’m not anti-vaccination,” Mrs Ryalls said, “but it’s a big area with a lot of questions. I would never say to anyone don’t have it, because it has to be a personal choice. I would say do your own research and don’t just rely on the school leaflet.” Emily managed to return to school to complete enough GCSEs to move into the sixth-form college where she is now studying English language and photography. She hopes to study the latter at university. The MHRA said it had no concerns on the numbers of ADRs related to the HPV vaccine and that the “expected benefits in preventing illness and death from HPV infection outweigh the known risks”. The agency said: “The vast majority of suspected side effect reports for HPV vaccine relate to known risks of vaccination that are well described in the available product information. The reporting rate of suspected side effects, which are not necessarily proven to be caused by the vaccine, is influenced by many factors and expected to differ across vaccines. The greater number of reports for HPV vaccine does not necessarily mean that it is any less safe than other vaccines. “Reports of PoTS following HPV vaccine remain under review by EU regulators. PoTS can occur naturally in adolescent girls and, at present, there is insufficient evidence to indicate that the vaccine is a cause. This will remain under review.”


Published: May 28, 2015


Dare to publish a scientific study against Big Biotech, and Monsanto will defame and discredit you. For the first time, a Monsanto employee admits that there is an entire department within the corporation with the simple task of ‘discrediting’ and ‘debunking’ scientists who speak out against GMOs. The WHO recently classified glyphosate, a chemical in Monsanto’s best-selling herbicide Roundup, as carcinogenic – news that is really heating things up with biotech. So Monsanto has been demanding that the World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) retract their statements about the poisons’s toxicity to human health. The company demands this even though a peer-reviewed study published in March of 2015 in the respected journal, The Lancet Oncology, conducted a analysis proving that glyphosate was indeed ‘probably carcinogenic.’ Monsanto’s vice president of global regulatory affairs Philip Miller told Reuters the following in interview:

“We question the quality of the assessment. The WHO has something to explain.”

It has already been explained, Mr. Miller. The study states:

“Glyphosate is a broad-spectrum herbicide, currently with the highest production volumes of all herbicides. It is used in more than 750 different products for agriculture, forestry, urban, and home applications. Its use has increased sharply with the development of genetically modified glyphosate-resistant crop varieties. Glyphosate has been detected in air during spraying, in water, and in food. There WAS limited evidence in humans for the carcinogenicity of glyphosate. Glyphosate has been detected in the blood and urine of agricultural workers, indicating absorption. Soil microbes degrade glyphosate to aminomethylphosphoric acid (AMPA). Blood AMPA detection after poisonings suggests intestinal microbial metabolism in humans. Glyphosate and glyphosate formulations induced DNA and chromosomal damage in mammals, and in human and animal cells in vitro. One study reported increases in blood markers of chromosomal damage (micronuclei) in residents of several communities after spraying of glyphosate formulations.”

In a recent talk attended mostly by students hoping to get decent paying internships in their field, a student asked what the company was doing to negate “bad science” concerning their work. Monsanto’s employee, Dr. William “Bill” Moar, who gives talks on Monsanto’s products to reassure everyone that they are safe, perhaps forgot the event was public when he openly revealed that Monsanto had:

“An entire department” (waving his arm for emphasis) dedicated to “debunking” science which disagreed with theirs.”

Likely, this is the first time a Monsanto employee has publicly admitted that they have immense political and financial weight to bear on scientists who dare to publish against them. Of course they don’t list this discrediting department anywhere on their website. The company will stop at nothing to discredit and devalue the contributions of unimpeachably respected Lancet and the international scientific bodies of WHO and IARC, among others. The stakes are high – after all, an entire industry of GMO seed (for which they currently hold more than a three-fourths monopoly share) is based on being Roundup ready. Glyphosate is their hallmark product, and it accounts for billions in sales when you account for the seed they sell to go with their best-selling herbicide. In a single publicly made phrase, Moar has admitted that the Monsanto-funded science is sheer propaganda – essentially that they indeed have dozens, if not hundreds of employees out making sure that no science which tells the truth about their cancer-causing products ever garners any credibility whatsoever in the information age. Monsanto has also held up the findings of regulatory bodies, particularly in the United States where the revolving door between agrochemical corporations and government seems never ending.

Editor In Chief Of World’s Best Known Medical Journal: “Half Of All The Literature Is False”

“Science has taken a turn towards Darkness”


In the past few years more professionals have come forward to share a truth that, for many people, proves difficult to swallow. One such authority is Dr. Richard Horton, the current editor-in-chief of the Lancet – considered to be one of the most well respected peer-reviewed medical journals in the world.

Dr. Horton recently published a statement declaring that a lot of published research is in fact unreliable at best, if not completely false.

“The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness.” (source)

This is quite disturbing, given the fact that all of these studies (which are industry sponsored) are used to develop drugs/vaccines to supposedly help people, train medical staff, educate medical students and more.

It’s common for many to dismiss a lot of great work by experts and researchers at various institutions around the globe which isn’t “peer-reviewed” and doesn’t appear in a “credible” medical journal, but as we can see, “peer-reviewed” doesn’t really mean much anymore. “Credible” medical journals continue to lose their tenability in the eyes of experts and employees of the journals themselves, like Dr. Horton.

He also went on to call himself out in a sense, stating that journal editors aid and abet the worst behaviours, that the amount of bad research is alarming, that data is sculpted to fit a preferred theory. He goes on to observe that important confirmations are often rejected and little is done to correct bad practices. What’s worse, much of what goes on could even be considered borderline misconduct.

Dr. Marcia Angell, a physician and longtime Editor in Chief of the New England Medical Journal (NEMJ), which is considered to another one of the most prestigious peer-reviewed medical journals in the world, makes her view of the subject quite plain:

“It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of the New England Journal of Medicine”  (source)

I apologize if you have seen it before in my articles, but it is quite the statement, and it comes from someone who also held a position similiar to Dr. Horton.

There is much more than anecdotal evidence to support these claims, however, including documents obtained by Lucija Tomljenovic, PhD, from the Neural Dynamics Research Group in the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences at the University of British Columbia, which reveal that vaccine manufacturers, pharmaceutical companies, and health authorities have known about multiple dangers associated with vaccines but chose to withhold them from the public. This is scientific fraud, and their complicity suggests that this practice continues to this day. (source)

This is just one of many examples, and alludes to one point Dr. Horton is referring to, the ommision of data. For the sake of time, I encourage you to do your own research on this subject. I just wanted to provide some food for thought about something that is not often considered when it comes to medical research, and the resulting products and theories which are then sold to us based on that research.

It’s truly a remarkable time to be alive. Over the course of human history, our planet has experienced multiple paradigm shifting realizations, all of which were met with harsh resistence at the time of their revelation. One great example is when we realized the Earth was not flat. Today, we are seeing these kinds of revelatory shifts in thinking happen in multiple spheres, all at one time. It can seem overwhelming for those who are paying attention, especially given the fact that a lot of these ideas go against current belief systems. There will always be resistance to new information which does not fit into the current framework, regardless of how reasonable (or factual) that information might be.

Hahnemanns thoughts on casestaking. 2 of 2.

Kennedy Drops Bombshell: 70% News Ad Revenue From Pharma

By Jefferey Jaxen

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is at it again. After speaking in Sacramento, California against SB-277, pummeling the Centers for Disease Control during public testimony in Vermontand appearing on Bill Maher’s HBO show to do the same, he has now broke major news during a recent interview. Speaking with former Minnesota Governor Jesse Ventura regarding the vaccine industry and big pharma, Kennedy confirmed what many have assumed by stating:

 “I ate breakfast last week with the president of a network news division and he told me that during non-election years, 70% of the advertising revenues for his news division come from pharmaceutical ads. And if you go on TV any night and watch the network news, you’ll see they become just a vehicle for selling pharmaceuticals. He also told me that he would fire a host who brought onto his station a guest who lost him a pharmaceutical account.” 

These powerful admissions by Kennedy are made with the supporting backdrop of five-time Emmy Award winning investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson recently stated:“If people were simply covering in terms of news value, facts, and fairness we’d be giving way more coverage to vaccine side effects, autism, ADD, and all the immune disorders that have emerged in the past and been made untouchable by this environment that I’ve discussed with you (referring to astroturfing.)Indeed it appears that we are seeing a major push by highly unethical, fraudulent pharmaceutical companies attempting to legally corral the entire American public into unwilling consumers of their vaccine products. This current move has revealed major conflicts-of-interest among many senators, news organizations and regulatory agencies. In addition, there appears to be a near mutiny among good senators and congressmen who are rapidly introducing bills to counter the drug company-sponsored vaccine exemption removal push being witnessed in state houses across the U.S.

Jefferey Jaxen is an independent journalist, writer, and researcher. Focusing on personal empowerment and alternative health, his work reveals a sharp eye to capture the moment in these rapidly changing times. His personal page is located at, where thisfirst appeared

Hahnemanns thoughts on casetaking.

Temen por bebés sobrevivientes de vacuna/Fear for surviving babies vaccine. English-Espanol.

Temen por bebés sobrevivientes de vacuna

  • Unas 3 mil personas de la comunidad de La Pimienta, Simojovel, a la que pertenecen los niños vacunados, realizaron una marcha. Foto: Tomada de Facebook
Edgar Hernández / Corresponsal

Tapachula, México (23 mayo 2015).-

Hallan contaminación externa en vacunas

Familiares de los bebés que fueron hospitalizados en Chiapas tras presentar reacciones alérgicas a una vacuna expresaron su temor de que los 29 menores sobrevivientes padezcan secuelas al paso del tiempo.

Edgar Hernandez / Correspondent

Tapachula, Mexico (May 23, 2015) .-

En el marco de una marcha realizada en el Municipio de Simojovel, al que pertenecen los 52 niños que fueron vacunados el pasado 8 de mayo, los inconformes exigieron justicia por los menores que fueron hospitalizados y por los dos que fallecieron.”Quién nos garantiza que estos 29 bebés van a quedar bien. ¿Qué tal en 5 años presentan cáncer o alguna otra enfermedad incurable? Seguro el Gobierno dirá que por falta de alimentación y de cuidado. Eso nos preocupa a todos, que no queden bien y que más adelante tengamos que salir a buscar a hospitales gastando nuestro poco de dinero”.

“Por eso, que el Gobierno se responsabilice en todo, y que no sólo quede como responsabilidad de este Gobierno sino también de los que vienen”, exigieron.

En un pronunciamiento leído en la peregrinación, en la cual participaron unos 3 mil habitantes de la comunidad de La Pimienta, pidieron castigo a directivos del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS), la Comisión Federal para la Protección contra Riesgos Sanitarios (Cofepris) y el Gobierno de Chiapas.

Marcelo Pérez, párroco de Simojovel, afirmó que el Gobierno de Manuel Velasco ofreció ayuda económica a los familiares de los bebés, pero fue rechazado.

Expuso que sostuvieron una reunión con funcionarios de la Cofepris, quienes explicaron a una delegación de La Pimienta sobre la bacteria staphylococcus hominis que, según la autoridad, contaminó las vacunas aplicadas a los menores contra la tuberculosis, rotavirus y hepatitis B.

Sin embargo, afirmó, no creen en dicha versión.

“Ese argumento, aunque no somos doctores, pero no tiene lógica, ni siquiera los hermanos aceptan esa versión, porque ni modos que a todos les entró la bacteria”, expresó Pérez.

En su pronunciamiento, los manifestantes denunciaron que la mala condición de la clínica y del camino de La Pimienta a la cabecera municipal de Simojovel fueron factores por las que la atención a los pequeños fue tardía.

Agregaron que lo ocurrido en Simojovel no es un caso aislado, pues hace seis años, en el Municipio de San Fernando, fueron vacunados 18 niños y empezaron a vomitar sangre.

Refirieron que, en la Administración del ex Gobernador Pablo Salazar, 24 niños murieron en el hospital general de Comitán.

La presunta negligencia de la Administración del ex Mandatario fue uno de los cargos que éste enfrentó durante su encarcelamiento.

Edgar Hernandez / Correspondent

Tapachula, Mexico (May 23, 2015) .-

Relatives of babies who were hospitalized in Chiapas after presenting allergic reactions to a vaccine expressed concern that the 29 child survivors suffer consequences over time. In the framework of a march held in the municipality of Simojovel, which owns 52 children who were vaccinated last May 8, the protesters demanded justice for children who were hospitalized and two who died. “Who guarantees us that these 29 babies will be fine. How about in five years have cancer or some another incurable disease? sure the government will say that lack of food and care. It concerns us all, do not fit well and later have to go out to some hospitals spending our money. ” “So that Government accountability at all, and not only remain the responsibility of this government but also those who come, “they demanded. In a statement read on the pilgrimage, which was attended by some 3000 people in the community of La Pimienta, asked executives punishment Mexican Social Security Institute (IMSS), the Federal Commission for Protection Against Health Risks (COFEPRIS) and the Government of Chiapas.Marcelo Perez, pastor of Simojovel, said the government of Manuel Velasco offered economic aid to the families of the babies, but was rejected. He explained that held a meeting with officials Cofepris who explained to a delegation of Pepper on staphylococcus bacteria hominis, according to the authority, contaminated vaccines given to children against tuberculosis , rotavirus and hepatitis B.

However, he said, do not believe in that version.
said, do not believe in that version. “This argument, although we are not doctors, but makes no sense, even the brothers accept that version, because not all ways that you entered the bacteria” said Perez. In its decision, the protesters claimed that the poor condition of the clinic and the way Pepper to the municipal head of Simojovel were factors why the attention to little was late. They added that what happened in Simojovel not It is an isolated case, as six years ago, in the municipality of San Fernando were vaccinated 18 children and began to vomit blood. referred that, in the administration of former Governor Pablo Salazar, 24 children died in the general hospital of Comitan. The alleged negligence of the administration of former president was one of the charges he faced during his imprisonment.
“This argument, although we are not doctors, but makes no sense, even the brothers accept that version, because not all ways that you entered the bacteria” said Perez. In it sdecision, the protesters claimed that the poor condition of the clinic and the way Pepper to the municipal head of Simojovel were factors why the attention to little was late. They added that what happened in Simojovel not It is an isolated case, as six years ago, in the municipality of San Fernando were vaccinated 18 children and began to vomit blood. referred that, in  the administration of former Governor Pablo Salazar, 24 children died in the general hospital of Comitan. The alleged negligence of the administration of former president was one of the charges he faced during his imprisonment.

‘Staphylococcus hominis’ bacteria that contaminated babies in Chiapas

Editor comment. Somehow, this answer does not give me confidence in the validity of the results of the tests. I have lost faith in the pharmaceutical Industry that they will be neutral in their presentation. 32 babies all having the same reaction after vaccination? It leaves too many questions…….

 By Carolina Gomez Mena

Fri, 22 May 2015 14:28

Mexico, DF. The bacteria that contaminated the baby almost two weeks ago at the Pepper, Chiapas community wasStaphylococcus hominis , Javier Dávila, director of Medical Services of the IMSS.

At a press conference the official explained that this infectious agent Staphylococcus hominis are found in the skin of people.

Davila said it is unknown how the children were infected with the bacteria and added that such research should be undertaken by the judicial authorities.

Nearly two weeks ago, on 9 May, it was reported that 31 infants had health complications after being vaccinated. Two of them died.

Davila stressed that now is known that vaccines were in good condition, and that what happened was an external contamination of minors.

Bill seeks to force states into full compliance for Vaccines


Robert Harrington
POSTED ON MAY 17, 2015

The U.S. Congress is now entertaining legislation which will make mandatory childhood vaccination schedules currently prescribed by the CDC. The way of enforcing this new and stricter regime is by tying compliance directly to federal funding.

From the bill:

“REQUIREMENT.—For a State or a political subdivision or other public entity of a State to be eligible to receive a grant under this section, the applicant shall demonstrate to the Secretary’s satisfaction that, subject to paragraphs (2) and (3), the State requires each student enrolled in one of the State’s public elementary schools or public secondary schools to be vaccinated in accordance with the recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices.”

Should this legislation pass, it will make it virtually impossible for parents to opt out their children from the aggressive childhood schedules, regardless of the reason. Up until now, there have been exemptions granted for a variety of good reasons. Religious and philosophical exemptions are chief among those which have produced an immediate release for those children attending public school.

Read: Parents Voice Resounding “NO” to Forced Vaccinations

What is particularly puzzling is that children are reacting to the ingredients in vaccines with greater frequency. Nevertheless, doctors rarely if ever test their pediatric patients for allergies, sensitivities, or intolerances to the various proven toxins and contaminants put in vaccines.

It would seem reasonable that the undeveloped and fragile bodies of newborn infants and young children would prompt the medical authorities to err on the side of caution. In fact, there is always a rush to vaccinate in spite of the complete lack of qualifying each baby or young child as a candidate for these potentially illness-causing vaccines. Family histories alone would provide a good starting point in trying to determine the likelihood of an adverse reaction.

Do you think there should be mandatory vaccinations, or do you think parents should have the choice to vaccinate their children – or at least decide to opt out of certain vaccinations while allowing others?

Additional Sources:


How can this be? Vaccines are actually bad for you?

Full Report here